
Otto Preminger’s Laura definitely deserves to be remembered. The cinematography follows in the footsteps of Citizen Kane in how it portrays the main character through camera tricks and storytelling.
(SPOILER ALERT) Lydecker did it. Ok? At the point in the movie where we find out about this, you do not even care really. Lydecker becomes irrelevant. However there are some huge hints throughout the movie that range from obvious too subtle. The obvious hint is when McPhearson arrests Laura and Lydecker is excited that she is the one getting arrested, not him.
Other moments where Lydecker’s guilt is foreshadowed are subtler. Lydecker owns a pair of unique clocks and gave Laura one of them. When this was mentioned, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince popped into my head. It seemed a lot like the vanishing cabinets kept in the room of requirement, in Hogwarts, and the other was in Borgan and Burkes, which was in Knockturn Alley, the shopping center for dark wizards. The cabinets were used to send items that would be used to kill Dumbledore. Which is ironic because that clock is where Lydecker hid the shotgun he used to kill the model Vincent Price’s character was bangin’ at Laura’s place thinking it was Laura.

Other things that were noticeable in the way the movie was shot was that at certain moments in the film, Lydecker cast a very strong shadow, hinting to his ill intentions. Other characters of course had shadows, but were none were as eye grabbing as Lydecker’s. As he was leaving Laura’s apartment near the end of the movie his shadow was extremely dark. Also, McPhearson would only pull out that little baseball game, like he is trying to figure out Lydecker, to physically put the pieces in place, much like Kane’s second wife with the jigsaw puzzles.



Wow-- you noticed a lot of foreshadowing of Lydecker being the killer that went completely over my head! Good job.
ReplyDeleteI remember as we were approaching the end of the movie thinking, "Wow.. we still haven't figured out who the killer is yet", and feeling like I didn't even quite care who had done it anymore, so I agree with you that this point of the movie became almost irrelevant-- I was much more concerned with who the characters were and how they interacted. At the same time, once we found out it was Lydecker I looked back on it and thought, "Of course." There were hints to this that even I didn't miss!
It's really interesting that you connected the two clocks with the vanishing cabinets in HP-- I never would have thought of a way this movie could connect to Harry Potter!
I also agree with the foreshadowing points you made, I didn't pick up on all of them. Nicely done. I always had a weird feeling about Lydecker from the very beginning of the film. I almost felt like I would have fallen in love with Laura based on looks alone but once I met her, eh, I don't date puppets.
ReplyDeleteNice connection with Harry Potter,vanishing cabinets and secret clocks, well done! I really enjoyed reading about all of the subtle details that eventually led to show that Lydecker was the murderer in the end. There were points that I was bouncing between who actually committed the crime,but when we found out as you said I didn't really give it another thought. Besides Lydecker just was pretty creepy for my taste,I remember him speaking within about two inches of one of the other characters faces...yeah, a bit to close for comfort.
ReplyDeleteI like how you analyzed the baseball puzzle and connected it to Citizen Kane, I completely agree. I also really like you analysis of lighting and how it is used to establish Lydecker’s character and show foreshadowing. I didn’t even pick up on this, so I’ll have to keep an eye out next time I watch the film.
ReplyDeleteI do have a question for you in regards to the scene where McPherson first sees Laura. Why do you think that Premminger decided to have McPherson fall asleep in the scene and then wake up to discover Laura? He could’ve just as easily had her walk in while he was sitting or investigating. What is the significance of him waking up to discover her? Did you take this scene as being dream-like? And if so, why do you think this was done? I’m not sure how I feel and I’m curious to see what you think.
Wow. I'm not sure that anybody's mentioned Laura and Harry Potter in the same paragraph before.
ReplyDeleteAnd this is just really, really good. You are absolutely right. The femme fatale isn't even the real Laura, but the huge painting of her. That is a head explodey sort of insight. Not a real person at all, but a visual concept. That makes so much sense out of so much of the quiet oddness of this movie.